Hunting alleged Nazi war criminals Essay

I senst say if hunting national socialist contend criminals is worth it, but I can give my opinion and it is up to you to make up your own mind. By the end of reading this, you should ease up come to more or less conclusion.I take it is non worth hunting on the wholeeged Nazi fightf be criminals, any(prenominal)more. I think that spending tens of millions of pounds, and totally the quantify and effort that goes into it now is visionary now. If they had spend a penny through with(p) it ten or fifteen tenacious fourth dimension later on the war had ended because they would have had much more success. The reason I think it is worthless now is because almost all induction go away have been destroyed later on the war ended, and any war criminals from World War II would have done their best to completely hide their place setting and any evidence they have that they committed war crimes. Also victims that survived concentration camps pass on non be able-bodied to localise a gentle serviceman with impregnable authorizedty that he was the same man that format people to death around cubic decimeter years ago, mainly for the simple reason that it was so long ago.Also witnesses may requisite to blame someone, so they blame the suspect in question, or they want it to be that suspect so much that they believe it was him. Also lots of witnesses atomic number 18 now dead, and the ones who are dumb alive may have something ravish with them that they cant remember the face or voice of the man who put their friends and family to death. I overly think that if they do catch a guess Nazi war criminal, then he may have something mentally wrong with him. Due to quondam(a) age the accused might non be able to remember anything, so it would be an cheating(prenominal) tribulation, because he doesnt have an self-justification with which to establish he was not a Nazi war criminal.A suspect may be in addition honest-to-goodness or ill to go t o act also, a suspect when found could be destruction in their bed with only a some weeks to live and so they would never be able to stand a court ladder anyway. These are the main reasons I believe that spending all the time, silver and effort is not worth it. I believe it is too late and the suspects will be dying by the time they are found, an eccentric of this is seen in a case where a man called Szymon Serafinowicz, who was accused of existence a nazi war criminal. In this case the jury saw Serafinowicz to be unfit to plead to charges of war crimes, because he had dementure, so he couldnt remember anything ab come to the fore where he was at authentic measure of the war, or what he was doing meaning he wouldnt have an alibi with which to protect himself so the case would have been only unfair.After being freed he died about 18 months later, so all the same if he had have been convicted he would have only spent a someer months in jail, and would have probably been let out afterwards a couple of weeks to be admitted into hospital. in that location was no case for this man who was suspected of being in command of police officers who ordinateed Jews to set up face down in the snow and where then shot, hit childrens heads against tomb stones to kill them, order Jewish families to line up and then rupture them, and he himself was accused of shooting a char with a child who was running away. In original he was accused ordering 3000 Jews to be killed. If a man like this cant change surface bump a trial then, let alone being convicted is it really likely that other man will get convicted.In another case, the Demjanjuk trial he was convicted of being Ivan the terrible a hold at Treblinka and was accused of putting thousands to death, and torturing some people for the fun of it. He was sentenced to death by hanging, but got released after appealing. The judges decided in that location was not enough evidence to convict him after all. Five w itnesses said under oath that they were certain that Demjajuk was Ivan the terrible, also he couldnt remember where he was or what he was doing at certain times in the war, and it sounded like he was trying to think he was at certain places at certain times. It appeared only five outgo twenty survives sentiment Demjanjuk was Ivan the terrible, and these were the witnesses used in court.If fifteen say it wasnt him and only five say it was him, the chances are that it was not him, even though five witnesses were sure of it, this proves that heart and soul witnesses can not be totally relied upon to identify a man they saw about fifty years ago. This proves to me that it is not worth the bother and money of hunting them down anymore, but if you are not convinced yet I will gabble about another trial, the Papon case. The jury hear that Papon should be freed during the trial, because of his advanced age and his medical form (he suffered from angina). It was heard that even if he wer e found vile he would not have to spend another night in jail. He died a few months later, so if he had have been convicted he was still be able to be free and walk about the streets.The war crimes unit did not get a single person convicted, even after all the effort they put in, they found evidence but did not manage to get a single conviction.After looking at all the evidence I really dont think it is worth spending lots of time and effort and millions of pounds to find an old man who will probably be too ill and old to go through a court case, and even if they are fit to go through trial then they probably wont be convicted collect to not enough evidence, or unreliable evidence.